| Triangle Capital (TCAP) 10q q2 2009 - Comments |
|
|
|
| Written by Administrator |
| Monday, 28 September 2009 04:15 |
|
Triangle Capital TCAP- Triangle q2 10qComments (scroll down)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
The following discussion is designed to provide a better understanding of our unaudited consolidated financial statements, including a brief discussion of our business, key factors that impacted our performance and a summary of our operating results. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in the financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future periods. "Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements which are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. Forward-looking statements may include, among other things, statements as to our future operating results, our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies, the impact of the investments that we expect to make, the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives, our expected financings and investments, the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital, and the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies. Words such as "expect," "anticipate," "target," "goals," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate," "continue," "forecast," "may," "should," "potential," variations of such words, and similar expressions indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Readers are cautioned that the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are only predictions, are not guarantees of future performance, and are subject to risks, events, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors discussed in Item 1A entitled "Risk Factors" in Part I of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include changes in the economy, risks associated with possible disruption due to terrorism in our operations or the economy generally, and future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas. These statements are based on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts, information and projections about the industry in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless we are required to do so by law. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
Overview of Our Business
We are a Maryland corporation which has elected to be treated and operates as an internally managed business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or 1940 Act. Our wholly owned subsidiary, Triangle Mezzanine Fund LLLP (the "Fund") is licensed as a small business investment company, or SBIC, by the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, and has also elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. We and the Fund invest primarily in debt instruments, equity investments, warrants and other securities of lower middle market privately held companies located in the United States.
Our business is to provide capital to lower middle market companies in the United States. We define lower middle market companies as those with annual revenues between $10.0 and $100.0 million. We focus on investments in companies with a history of generating revenues and positive cash flows, an established market position and a proven management team with a strong operating discipline. Our target portfolio company has annual revenues between $20.0 and $75.0 million and annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, between $2.0 and $20.0 million. (middle market diversification)
We invest primarily in senior and subordinated debt securities secured by first and second lien security interests in portfolio company assets, coupled with equity interests. Our investments generally range from $5.0 to $15.0 million per portfolio company. In certain situations, we have partnered with other funds to provide larger financing commitments.
We generate revenues in the form of interest income, primarily from our investments in debt securities, loan origination and other fees and dividend income. Fees generated in connection with our debt investments are recognized over the life of the loan using the effective interest method or, in some cases, recognized as earned. In addition, we generate revenue in the form of capital gains, if any, on warrants or other equity-related securities that we acquire from our portfolio companies. Our debt investments generally have a term of between three and seven years and typically bear interest at fixed rates between 11.0% and 16.0% per annum. Certain of our debt investments have a form of interest, referred to as paid-in-kind, or PIK, interest, (CAN BE TOXIC and or Get wiped out in bankruptcy) that is not paid currently but that is accrued and added to the loan balance and paid at the end of the term. In our negotiations with potential portfolio companies, we generally seek to minimize PIK interest. Cash interest on our debt investments is generally payable monthly; however, some of our debt investments pay cash interest on a quarterly basis.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the weighted average yield on all of our outstanding debt investments (including PIK interest) was approximately 14.3% and 14.4%, respectively. The weighted average yield on all of our outstanding investments (including equity and equity-linked investments) was approximately 13.1% and 13.2% as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. (NICE YIELDS)
The Fund is eligible to sell debentures guaranteed by the SBA in the capital markets at favorable interest rates and invest these funds in portfolio companies. We intend to continue to operate the Fund as an SBIC, subject to SBA approval, and to utilize the proceeds of the sale of the Fund's SBA-guaranteed debentures, referred to herein as SBA leverage, to enhance returns to our stockholders. (VERY GOOD)
Portfolio Composition
The total value of our investment portfolio was $176.5 million as of June 30, 2009, as compared to $182.1 million as of December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009, we had investments in 33 portfolio companies with an aggregate cost of $185.4 million. As of December 31, 2008, we had investments in 34 portfolio companies with an aggregate cost of $180.2 million. As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of our portfolio investments represented greater than 10% of the total fair value of our investment portfolio.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our investment portfolio consisted of the following investments:
Percentage of Percentage of
Cost Total Portfolio Fair Value Total Portfolio
June 30, 2009:
Subordinated debt and 2nd lien notes(got hurt here) $ 150,531,337 81 % $ 140,313,651 80 %
Senior debt 17,708,373 10 17,170,826 10
Equity shares/membership interests 13,866,846 8 14,781,000 8
Equity warrants 2,415,370 1 3,411,600 2
Royalty rights 874,400 - 818,200 -
$ 185,396,326 100 % $ 176,495,277 100 %
December 31, 2008:
Subordinated debt and 2nd lien notes $ 147,493,871 82 % $ 143,015,291 79 %
Senior debt 16,269,628 9 16,269,628 9
Equity shares/membership interests 13,684,269 8 17,301,372 9
Equity warrants 1,829,370 1 4,644,600 3
Royalty rights 874,400 - 874,400 -
$ 180,151,538 100 % $ 182,105,291 100 %
(added several million of capital over the last year)
Non-Accrual Assets
As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our non-accrual assets comprised 1.5% of the total fair value of our portfolio, and the cost of our non-accrual assets comprised 3.2% of the total cost of our portfolio. Our non-accrual assets as of June 30, 2009 are the following:
Gerli and Company http://www.gerlico.com/
1. In the third quarter of 2008, we recognized an unrealized loss of $0.3 million on our subordinated note investment in Gerli and Company ("Gerli"), which has a cost as of June 30, 2009 of approximately $3.2 million. This unrealized loss reduced the fair value of our investment in Gerli to $2.8 million as of September 30, 2008. During the third quarter of 2008, we continued to receive interest payments in accordance with our loan agreement. In November 2008, we placed our investment in Gerli on non-accrual status. As a result, under generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), we no longer recognize interest income on our investment in Gerli. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized an additional unrealized loss on our investment in Gerli of $0.9 million and in the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized an additional unrealized loss on our investment in Gerli of $0.1 million. As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our investment in Gerli is $1.8 million.
Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. http://www.spoke.com/info/c5mTNr7/FireSprinklerSystemsInc
In 2008, we recognized an unrealized loss of $1.4 million on our subordinated note investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems, Inc. ("Fire Sprinkler Systems"), which has a cost as of June 30, 2009 of approximately $2.4 million. This unrealized loss reduced the fair value of our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems to $1.0 million as of December 31, 2008. Through the first nine months of 2008, we continued to receive interest and principal payments in accordance with our loan agreement. In October 2008, we placed our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems on non-accrual status. As a result, under generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), we no longer recognize interest income on our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems. In the first six months of 2009, we recognized an additional unrealized loss on our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems of $0.2 million. As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of our investment in Fire Sprinkler Systems is $0.8 million.
Results of Operations
Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 Investment Income
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, total investment income was $6.6 million, a 31% increase from $5.0 million of total investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to a $1.5 million increase in total loan interest, fee and dividend income due to net increase in our portfolio investments from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. We did not recognize any non-recurring fee income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Expenses
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, expenses increased by 34% to $3.3 million from $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in expenses was attributable to a $0.8 million increase in interest expense due to higher average balances of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2009 than in the comparable period in 2008.
Net Investment Income
As a result of the $1.6 million increase in total investment income and the $0.8 million increase in expenses, net investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $3.2 million compared to net investment income of $2.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net realized gains on investments totaling $0.8 million, consisting primarily of i) a realized gain on the sale of one investment of $1.8 million and ii) a loss on the recapitalization of another investment of $0.9 million. We recognized no realized gains or losses on investments in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of investments in the amount of $6.9 million, comprised of net unrealized depreciation reclassification adjustments totaling $0.6 million related primarily to the sale of one investment and the recapitalization of another investment noted above, as well as unrealized depreciation on sixteen other investments totaling $6.8 million offset by unrealized appreciation on eight investments totaling $0.5 million. In the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized appreciation of investments in the amount of $0.4 million, comprised of unrealized appreciation on nine investments totaling $1.9 million and unrealized depreciation on eight investments totaling $1.5 million.
As a result of these events, our net decrease in net assets resulting from operations during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.9 million as compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 Investment
Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, total investment income was $13.1 million, a 47% increase from $8.9 million of total investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was attributable to a $4.2 million increase in total loan interest, fee and dividend income due to net increase in our portfolio investments from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. Non-recurring fee income was $0.3 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Expenses
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, expenses increased by 53% (expenses raising higher then revenue) to $6.8 million from $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in expenses was primarily attributable to a $1.9 million increase in interest expense and a $0.4 million increase in general and administrative expenses. The increase in interest expense is related to higher average balances of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2009 than in the comparable period in 2008. In addition, we experienced an increase in general and administrative costs in 2009, primarily related to compensation costs (including stock-based compensation) and facility costs. As of June 30, 2009, we had 14 full-time employees, as compared to 13 full-time employees as of June 30, 2008.
Net Investment Income
As a result of the $4.2 million increase in total investment income and the $2.4 million increase in expenses, net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $6.3 million compared to net investment income of $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting From Operations In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net realized gains of $0.8 million, consisting primarily of i) a realized gain on the sale of one investment of $1.8 million and ii) a loss on the recapitalization of another investment of $0.9 million. We recognized no realized gains or losses on investments in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of investments in the amount of $10.5 million, comprised of net unrealized depreciation reclassification adjustments totaling $0.6 million related to the sale of one investment and the recapitalization of another investment noted above, as well as unrealized depreciation on sixteen investments totaling $12.6 million and unrealized appreciation on eleven investments totaling $2.7 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of investments in the amount of $0.6 million, comprised of unrealized appreciation on ten investments totaling $2.6 million and unrealized depreciation on ten investments totaling $3.2 million.
As a result of these events, our net decrease in net assets resulting from operations during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $3.4 million as compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents on hand, our available SBA leverage and our anticipated cash flows from operations will be adequate to meet our cash needs for our daily operations for at least the next twelve months.
On April 27, 2009, we sold 1,200,000 shares of common stock, resulting in net proceeds to us, after underwriting discounts and offering expenses, of approximately $11,700,000. On May 27, 2009, pursuant to the exercise of an overallotment option granted in connection with the offering, the underwriters in this offering purchased an additional 80,000 shares of our common stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $800,000.
In the future, depending on the valuation of the Fund's assets pursuant to SBA guidelines, the Fund may be limited by provisions of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBA regulations governing SBICs, in making certain distributions to Triangle Capital Corporation that may be necessary to enable Triangle Capital Corporation to make the minimum required distributions to its stockholders and continue to qualify as a RIC.
Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we experienced a net increase in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $8.7 million. During that period, our operating activities provided $2.2 million in cash, consisting primarily of i) net investment income and ii) sales/repayments of portfolio investments of $6.8 million, offset by purchases of investments totaling $9.2 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, financing activities provided $6.5 million of cash, consisting of proceeds from our public stock offering of $12.5 million, net of cash dividends and distributions to stockholders totaling $5.9 million. At June 30, 2009, we had $35.9 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $3.1 million. During that period, our operating activities used $49.2 million in cash, consisting primarily of new portfolio investments of $57.3 million, and we generated $46.1 million of cash from financing activities, consisting of proceeds from borrowings under SBA guaranteed debentures payable of $52.1 million, partially offset by financing fees paid to the SBA of $1.8 million and cash dividends paid of $4.2 million. At June 30, 2008, we had $18.7 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand.
Financing Transactions
Due to the Fund's status as a licensed SBIC, the Fund has the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA at favorable interest rates. Under the Small Business Investment Act and the SBA rules applicable to SBICs, an SBIC (or group of SBICs under common control) can have outstanding at any time debentures guaranteed by the SBA in an amount up to three times the amount of its regulatory capital, which generally is the amount raised from private investors. The maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA issued by a single SBIC is currently $150.0 million. Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a maturity of ten years, with interest payable semi-annually. The principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity but may be pre-paid at any time. Debentures issued prior to September 2006 were subject to pre-payment penalties during their first five years. Those pre-payment penalties no longer apply to debentures issued after September 1, 2006.
In June 2009, the Fund received a new leverage commitment from the SBA which increased the Fund's ability to issue SBA guaranteed debentures up to the maximum statutory limit of $150.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, the Fund has $115.1 million of SBA guaranteed debentures outstanding. In addition to the one-time 1.0% fee on the total commitment from the SBA, the Company also pays a one-time 2.425% fee on the amount of each debenture issued. These fees are capitalized as deferred financing costs and are amortized over the term of the debt agreements using the effective interest method. The weighted average interest rate for all SBA guaranteed debentures as of June 30, 2009 was 6.03%. (ok I'll take 6.3% on government backed bonds compare to 4% 10 year notes)
Current Market Conditions
During 2008 and 2009, the debt and equity capital markets in the United States have been severely impacted by significant write-offs in the financial services sector relating to subprime mortgages and the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated bank loan market, among other things. These events, along with the deterioration of the housing market, decline in consumer confidence, and increase in unemployment in the first half of 2009, have led to an economic recession in the U.S. and abroad, which could be long-term. Banks, investment companies and others in the financial services industry have continued to report significant write-downs in the fair value of their assets, which has led to the failure of a number of banks and investment companies, a number of distressed mergers and acquisitions, the government take-over of the nation's two largest government-sponsored mortgage companies, and the passage of the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization of 2008 in October 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 in February 2009. These events have significantly impacted the financial and credit markets and have reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole, and for financial firms in particular. While we have capacity to issue additional SBA guaranteed debentures as discussed above, we may not be able to access additional equity capital, which could result in the slowing of our origination activity during 2010 and beyond. (I don't think this is a problem)
In the event that the United States economy remains in a recession, it is possible that the results of some of the middle market companies in which we invest could experience further deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults. There can be no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively impacted by challenging economic conditions . . .
|
| Last Updated on Monday, 28 September 2009 04:54 |


